Since the early history of jazz, this art form and its development have
been heavily talked about as being closely associated with issues of race. The Africans
brought to America during the times of the Atlantic Slave Trade brought with
them many key elements necessary to the creation of jazz, and the genre was
widely considered a “black art form” and is still often associated with African
American artists even today. Although this link between jazz music and race has
always existed, it was not until the 1930’s that greatly tangible racial
tensions began to arise in America, making race one of the most important
aspects of the genre’s existence at the time.
This flaring racial
tension was built up largely due to the increasing popularity of jazz, which
meant that there inevitably would be more and more financial gain possible for
artists within this genre. While jazz was still looked down upon by high
culture even into the 1930’s, the younger people of the time were becoming
enthralled with this music, listening to it in dance halls and sweeping the
nation with new dances to accompany it like the Jitterbug and the Charleston
(Lecture, 2/14/13). By patronizing these dance halls and creating these styles
of dance, young Americans were allowing jazz to assimilate progressively into
their popular culture. Due to this rise in popularity, many jazz artists could
not afford to be as concerned with the artistic value of their music; rather,
they were forced to be concerned with the mass appeal and profitability of
their musical endeavors (Lecture, 2/14/13). The impact of the Great Depression
during this time only increased the need for a musician’s mainstream appeal as
there was little money to go around during this era.
With jazz becoming
a widespread phenomenon with more and more artists involved in it, any given
jazz musician had to truly stand out among the crowd in order to be well off
financially. This was especially hard for African Americans, as they were not
exposed to the same opportunities to play shows as whites were. For example, many
big bands comprised of white musicians were able to secure places at concerts
more easily than bands made up of blacks. Not only this, but the audiences of many
concert and dance halls were racially segregated at the time, further polarizing
the power within the genre (Lecture, 2/12/13). This polarization was strengthened
even more by the fact that almost all jazz critics in the 1930’s were white (“Swing
Changes,” 52). Whites being dominant as jazz critics meant that they were
essentially able to dictate what was acceptable within the genre while blacks
could say little in return. This imbalance of power contributed greatly to the
racial tension brewing in the 1930’s.
This tension can be further exemplified by
looking at the career of Benny Goodman. Goodman advanced jazz in many ways and
is remembered today as the “King of Swing.” In 1937, Goodman, a white man, squared
off against Chick Webb, a black man, in a “swing battle” at the racially
desegregated Savoy in Harlem. Although Webb is believed to have won this battle
overall, Goodman is still called the King of Swing to this day, showing the imbalance
of racial focus in jazz music at this time (Lecture, 2/14/13). Additionally,
Goodman was one of the first to take the radio by storm as this new medium
gained prominence in the 30’s. As Gioia puts it, “Goodman sent this apparatus into
motion with a vengeance,” (129). This meant that mainstream America was
becoming accustomed to jazz music on a large scale that was coming from white musicians, taking away from jazz’s
influence as an African American art form. Goodman also advanced jazz by being
the first jazz musician to play at Carnegie Hall in 1938. In this performance
he also incorporated a few black musicians; this action can be seen as a step
towards racial integration within jazz at this time (Lecture, 2/14/13). In other
words, Goodman may have been responsible for both an increase and a decrease in
racial tensions in the 1930’s.
You brought up a lot of good points in your blog. I like the way you simultaneously trace changes in Jazz music and comment on racial tensions as you go along. Also, it was great how you made mention of how competition in general made it tough for even white musicians to make it big. This reality set next to the difficulties of being a black performer really place emphasis on the struggle many black jazz musicians faced and highlighted the tension that emerged as a result.
ReplyDeleteIt was also interesting that you asserted Goodman helped ease racial tension. It is a very original argument to make but I think it's valid. The fact that Goodman incorporated blacks into his show demonstrates a certain degree of racial sensitivity. Well done.
I thought it was great how you followed jazz back to its origins and made the point that racial tension had been building within the music until 1930's when during the depression, it was finally explicitly talked about. Your mention of the Great Depression and how it intensified competition between both black and white musicians introduced the race issues of the time well. I thought you could have gone into greater depth on the subject of the white jazz critic, but your point was very clear that since the white jazz critic could determine what was deemed good jazz, it only strengthened their monopoly on jazz performance spaces. You mention radio as an exposure of more white jazz but I also think its also important to mention black jazz artists’ appearances on the radio as a step in desegregating sound. Overall, I think you make a nice argument for Goodman as both an advocate for black musicians in his band and as himself, a white musician profiting off of jazz’s entrance into mainstream popular culture.
ReplyDelete